Checking out the Future of Dividend Development: The S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index– Indexology ® Blog Site

{“page”:0,” year”:2023,” monthnum”:12,” day”:13,” name”:” looking-into-the-future-of-dividend-growth-the-sp-500-high-dividend-growth-index”,” mistake”:””,” m”:””,” p”:0,” post_parent”:””,” subpost”:””,” subpost_id”:””,” accessory”:””,” attachment_id”:0,” pagename”:””,” page_id”:0,” 2nd”:””,” minute”:””,” hour”:””,” w”:0,” category_name”:””,” tag”:””,” feline”:””,” tag_id”:””,” author”:””,” author_name”:””,” feed”:””,” tb”:””,” paged”:0,” meta_key”:””,” meta_value”:””,” sneak peek”:””,” s”:””,” sentence”:””,” title”:””,” fields”:””,” menu_order”:””,” embed”:””,” classification __ in”: [],” classification __ not_in”: [],” classification __ and”: [],” post __ in”: [],” post __ not_in”: [],” post_name __ in”: [],” tag __ in”: [],” tag __ not_in”: [],” tag __ and”: [],” tag_slug __ in”: [],” tag_slug __ and”: [],” post_parent __ in”: [],” post_parent __ not_in”: [],” author __ in”: [],” author __ not_in”: [],” search_columns”: [],” ignore_sticky_posts”: incorrect,” suppress_filters”: incorrect,” cache_results”: real,” update_post_term_cache”: real,” update_menu_item_cache”: incorrect,” lazy_load_term_meta”: real,” update_post_meta_cache”: real,” post_type”:””,” posts_per_page”:” 5″,” nopaging”: incorrect,” comments_per_page”:” 50″,” no_found_rows”: incorrect,” order”:” DESC”}

[{“display”:”Craig Lazzara”,”title”:”Managing Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/craig_lazzara-353.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Tim Edwards”,”title”:”Managing Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/timothy_edwards-368.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Hamish Preston”,”title”:”Head of U.S. Equities”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/hamish_preston-512.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Anu Ganti”,”title”:”Senior Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/anu_ganti-505.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Fiona Boal”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Head of Equities”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/fiona_boal-317.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Phillip Brzenk”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Head of Multi-Asset Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/phillip_brzenk-325.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Howard Silverblatt”,”title”:”Senior Index Analyst, Product Management”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/howard_silverblatt-197.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Wenli Bill Hao”,”title”:”Senior Lead, Factors and Dividends Indices, Product Management and Development”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/bill_hao-351.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”John Welling”,”title”:”Director, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/john_welling-246.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Michael Orzano”,”title”:”Senior Director, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/Mike.Orzano-231.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Maria Sanchez”,”title”:”Director, Sustainability Index Product Management, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/maria_sanchez-527.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Shaun Wurzbach”,”title”:”Managing Director, Head of Commercial Group (North America)”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/shaun_wurzbach-200.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Silvia Kitchener”,”title”:”Director, Global Equity Indices, Latin America”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/silvia_kitchener-522.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Akash Jain”,”title”:”Director, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/akash_jain-348.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Ved Malla”,”title”:”Associate Director, Client Coverage”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/ved_malla-347.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Rupert Watts”,”title”:”Head of Factors and Dividends”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/rupert_watts-366.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Jason Giordano”,”title”:”Director, Fixed Income, Product Management”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/jason_giordano-378.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Brian Luke”,”title”:”Senior Director, Head of Commodities, Real & Digital Assets”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/brian.luke-509.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Sherifa Issifu”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/sherifa_issifu-518.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Qing Li”,”title”:”Director, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/qing_li-190.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Glenn Doody”,”title”:”Vice President, Product Management, Technology Innovation and Specialty Products”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/glenn_doody-517.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Priscilla Luk”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Research & Design, APAC”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/priscilla_luk-228.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Sean Freer”,”title”:”Director, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/sean_freer-490.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Liyu Zeng”,”title”:”Director, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/liyu_zeng-252.png”,”url”:””},{“display”:”George Valantasis”,”title”:”Associate Director, Factors and Dividends”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/george-valantasis-453.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Barbara Velado”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Research & Design, Sustainability Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/barbara_velado-413.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Benedek Vu00f6ru00f6s”,”title”:”Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/benedek_voros-440.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Cristopher Anguiano”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/cristopher_anguiano-506.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Joseph Nelesen”,”title”:”Senior Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/joseph_nelesen-452.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Michael Mell”,”title”:”Global Head of Custom Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/michael_mell-362.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Maya Beyhan”,”title”:”Senior Director, ESG Specialist, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/maya.beyhan-480.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Jason Ye”,”title”:”Director, Factors and Thematics Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/Jason%20Ye-448.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Andrew Innes”,”title”:”Head of EMEA, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/andrew_innes-189.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Rachel Du”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/rachel_du-365.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Izzy Wang”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Factors and Dividends”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Fei Wang”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/fei_wang-443.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Jaspreet Duhra”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Head of Sustainability Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/jaspreet_duhra-504.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Eduardo Olazabal”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/eduardo_olazabal-451.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Srineel Jalagani”,”title”:”Senior Director, Thematic Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/srineel_jalagani-446.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Ari Rajendra”,”title”:”Senior Director, Head of Thematic Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/Ari.Rajendra-524.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Daniel Perrone”,”title”:”Former Director and Head of Operations, ESG Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/daniel_perrone-387.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Louis Bellucci”,”title”:”Senior Director, Index Governance”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/louis_bellucci-377.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Elizabeth Bebb”,”title”:”Director, Factor & Dividend Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/elizabeth_bebb-511.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Raghu Ramachandran”,”title”:”Head of Insurance Asset Channel”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/raghu_ramachandram-288.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Narottama Bowden”,”title”:”Director, Sustainability Indices Product Management”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/narottama_bowden-331.jpg”,”url”:””}]

Checking Out the Future of Dividend Development: The S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index

Contributor Image

Wenli Costs Hao

Senior Lead, Aspects and Dividends Indices, Item Management and Advancement

S&P Dow Jones Indices

As the leading dividend index service provider, S&P DJI is continuously searching for brand-new methods and approaches to bring unique concepts to the marketplace. Our just recently introduced S&P 500 ®(* )High Dividend Development Index is a prime example of this ingenious thinking, as it integrates a positive evaluation into its method. This index tracks business in the S&P 500 that have not just provided constant or growing dividends in the past however likewise have the greatest projection dividend yield development. In doing so, constituents are chosen based upon what dividend they are anticipated to pay rather of being evaluated exclusively on what they have actually paid in the past. In this blog site, we will provide the index method, present the S&P Global Dividend Forecasting Dataset and examine the index’s risk/performance profile.

Method Introduction

To be qualified for choice, constituents should have kept or grown their historical dividends for 5 successive years and should likewise be predicted to do so over the next 12 months.

From this swimming pool of qualified stocks, the leading 100 constituents with the greatest projection dividend development ratings are chosen. Ball game is calculated as the 12-month projection yield minus the 12-month historic yield.

Lastly, the index constituents are weighted by projection dividend yield with restrictions put on specific stocks and GICS

® sectors. 1 To decrease turnover, the index utilizes a 20% buffer. Dividend Forecasting Information

The Dividend Projection Dataset is sourced from S&P Global Market Intelligence, which is another department within S&P Global. This group has more than 40 specialists carrying out essential analysis with the objective of providing exact projections of the size and timing of dividend payments. They serve over 150 consumers throughout the world, consisting of the majority of the top-tier worldwide banks.

2 Efficiency Evaluation

The efficiency data that follow are determined beginning in 2010, when the information for the dividend forecasting dataset started. Thus, the back-tested information integrates projections that were kept as and when they were made, without any look-ahead predisposition.

While this duration has actually been a strong efficiency duration for the S&P 500, the S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index has more than kept up. Considering that 2010, it has actually had actually an annualized return of 11.94% while providing a considerably greater yield.

Disadvantage Security and Benefit Involvement

The historic capture ratios versus the S&P 500 reveal that the S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index has actually displayed reasonably protective attributes (94.5% drawback capture). Additionally, typically, the index has actually traditionally taken part in 96% of the marketplace return in up-market durations.

3 This is greater than many dividend methods and is most likely an outcome of its reasonably lower worth tilt and greater development tilt. Historic Yield and Dividend Development Analysis

This ingenious method uses a special mix of dividend development and high yield. Considering that 2010, the index has actually had a typical yield of over 3%, easily outshining its criteria and other methods within the dividend development classification.

Remarkably, for a dividend technique providing a high yield, the index likewise has actually a high annualized dividend development rate. From 2010 to 2022, the S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index grew its dividend at a yearly rate of 13.8% (see Exhibition 3). This exceeds the long-lasting U.S. inflation rate, even with the current spike in inflation over the last couple of years.

Aspect Direct Exposure

Exhibition 4 reveals the aspect direct exposure distinction in between the S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index and

S&P 500 High Dividend Index in regards to Axioma Threat Design Aspect Z-scores. The S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index showed less worth tilt and had lower dividend yield than the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Sector Direct Exposure

From a sector point of view, the S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index had lower sector weights in Energies (-11.5%) and Property (-5.8%), while having greater sector weights in Industrials (9.6%) and Infotech (6.3%) than the S&P 500 High Dividend Index (see Exhibition 5).

In a market filled with passive dividend options, the S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index sticks out by making use of a positive technique while traditionally providing high dividend development and high yield. This index’s historic lower worth tilt and greater development tilt might assist to prevent compromising possible upside when looking for high yield.


For additional info about the index style, please see the S&P 500 High Dividend Development Index Method 2

For more details, please see this link 3

The marketplace is specified as the month-to-month efficiency of S&P 500 standards from April 16, 2010, to Oct. 31, 2023. The posts on this blog site are viewpoints, not recommendations. Please read our

Disclaimers Historic Offer at COP28 to Shift far from All Nonrenewable fuel source

Jason Ye

Contributor Image

Director, Aspects and Thematics Indices

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Tidy energy has actually definitely been a popular subject in 2023, specifically amongst those at the front and center of conversations at the United Nations Environment Modification Conference (COP28) in Dubai, which simply concluded. As we are approaching completion of 2023, we wished to examine the outcomes of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index Series rebalance from October and share a few of the essential advancements from the 2nd half of the year in the tidy energy area.

October Rebalance

Introduced in 2007, the

S&P Global Clean Energy Index has actually been a criteria to determine tidy energy-related business’ efficiency over the previous 16 years. In April 2021, we likewise introduced the S&P Global Clean Energy Select Index, which is developed to determine the 30 biggest business in worldwide tidy energy services that are noted on industrialized market exchanges. Both the S&P Global Clean Energy Index and the S&P Global Clean Energy Select Index went through a semiannual rebalance on Oct. 20, 2023. In the index method, we designate business to 4 pails of direct exposure ratings from 0 to 1 with an increment of 0.25 to determine their pureness of direct exposure to the tidy energy company. Exhibition 1 reveals the modification in direct exposure before and after the October rebalance. We can see that for the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, post rebalancing, we have 10 more business with a direct exposure rating of 1 being contributed to the index. The weighted typical direct exposure rating of the index enhanced from 0.92 to 0.95. This reveals the impact of rebalancing to enhance the pureness of index direct exposure to tidy energy business. The S&P Global Clean Energy Select Index, on the other hand, chooses 30 business with a direct exposure rating of 1 noted in the industrialized market exchanges.

On the marketplace allotment breakdown, the significant modification of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index post rebalancing is the 3.11% weight boost in India and 2.72% weight boost in China, together with a 5.01% weight decline in Spain. For the S&P Global Clean Energy Select Index, the weight of the U.S. increased by 11.86%, with a drop of 6.19% in New Zealand and a drop of 5.41% in Brazil.

S&P Global Clean Energy Index Efficiency YTD in 2023

After outshining the

S&P Global BMI in 2022, both the S&P Global Clean Energy Index and the S&P Global Clean Energy Select Index underperformed YTD through completion of November 2023. The S&P Global Clean Energy Select Index was down 21.49% and the S&P Global Clean Energy Index was down 27.88% in USD overall return terms. There was substantial dispersion seen amongst constituents; a few of the efficiency laggers consisted of Sunpower Corp (-76.98%), SolarEdge Technologies (-71.98%) and Plug Power (-67.34%), while Chubu Electric Power (up 38.24%), VERBUND AG (up 16.54%) and Very First Solar (up 5.33%) offseted a few of the loss with favorable efficiency contributions. In spite of the efficiency headwind, we continue to see motivating conversations all over the world on the energy shift, consisting of the following chosen highlights.

Secret Advancement

The International Energy Company (IEA) Launched the World Energy Outlook 2023

In October, the IEA launched the World Energy Outlook 2023, in which it states that making use of nonrenewable fuel sources is not decreasing rapidly enough, however the transfer to renewable resource is “unstoppable”.

1 According to the report, “Tripling renewable resource capability, doubling the rate of energy performance enhancements to 4% annually, increase electrification and slashing methane emissions from nonrenewable fuel source operations together supply more than 80% of the emissions decreases required by 2030 to put the energy sector on a path to restrict warming to 1.5 ° C.” 2 Worldwide Promise on Renewables and Energy Performance

At COP28, the Worldwide Promise on Renewables and Energy Performance was signed by 121 nations.

3 To name a few goals, those who sign the promise devote to “interact to triple the world’s set up renewable resource generation capability to a minimum of 11,000 GW by 2030, thinking about various beginning points and nationwide situations.” 4 POLICE OFFICER 28 Concluded with an Offer to Shift far from All Nonrenewable fuel source

After lots of nights of conversation, practically 200 nations reached an offer to shift far from all nonrenewable fuel sources. This first-ever arrangement as soon as again imposes the worldwide dedication to net absolutely no emissions by 2050. Although the offer is not lawfully binding, the message is loud and clear. It is now on each nation to establish its own program in order to phase out nonrenewable fuel sources “in a simply, organized and fair way.”

5 1 2

IEA (2023 ), World Energy Outlook 2023, IEA, Paris. 3 4 5 The posts on this blog site are viewpoints, not recommendations. Please read our

Disclaimers Going After Efficiency

Craig Lazzara

Contributor Image

Handling Director, Index Financial Investment Method

S&P Dow Jones Indices

” … in some cases I have actually thought as lots of as

6 difficult things before breakfast— The White Queen,
Through the Looking Glass Should a possession owner depend on historic efficiency information to choose supervisors? The effectiveness of doing so depends upon the responses to 3 concerns:

What portion of the supervisor universe is genuinely talented?

  • How talented are they?
  • How fortunate might the “regular” supervisors be?
  • For instance: Expect we presume that 60% of all supervisors are “talented” and 40% are “regular,” that a talented supervisor has a 75% possibility of attaining above-median outcomes, which a common supervisor has a 12.5% possibility of doing the exact same. Exhibition 1 reveals some ramifications of these presumptions for a 1000-manager universe.

Exhibition 1 consists of both great and problem for our theoretical possession owner. The bright side is that after one duration, 90% (450/500) of the above-median supervisors are really talented; if our presumptions are appropriate, employing just from the above-median swimming pool will raise the chances of success. The problem is that

our presumptions are likely inaccurate, not to state hugely impractical. Why? Due to the fact that these presumptions suggest that 69% (344/500) of duration 1’s above-median supervisors will likewise be above mean in duration 2– a determination rate far higher than those we really observe Exhibition 1 is, regretfully, an artifact of wishful thinking. If Exhibition 1’s presumptions are plainly incorrect, what options might be more sensible? To be more modest, we can decrease the population of talented supervisors from 60% to one-third, decrease their possibility of ranking above mean from 75% to 60%, and narrow the space in between the talented and the regular by setting the regular supervisors’ possibility of being above mean at 45%. As previously, Exhibition 2 consists of both great and problem for our theoretical possession owner.

The bright side is that utilizing Exhibition 2’s presumptions, 51% (255/500) of duration 1’s above-median supervisors need to duplicate that efficiency in duration 2. Although we do not frequently see outcomes that great, 51% determination is

not unusual, therefore Exhibition 2 is at least a rather possible design of truth. The problem in Exhibition 2 is that just 40% (200/500) of duration 1’s above-median supervisors are really talented; 60% of them arrived through luck instead of ability. And maybe even worse news: just 47% (120/255) of the supervisors who are above mean in

2 successive durations are really talented. To put it simply, a possession owner who employs from the above-median swimming pool is most likely to get a common supervisor than a talented one. Even if we presume that really talented supervisors exist– which they remain talented with time– employing an above-median entertainer offers a less-than-even possibility of discovering the talented supervisor we are looking for. Active management is hard, as readers of our

SPIVA Scorecards understand well; determining exceptional supervisors is maybe similarly difficult. Counting on historic efficiency rankings is not likely to be practical. The posts on this blog site are viewpoints, not recommendations. Please read our

Disclaimers Get a Holistic Lens on Sustainability


Contributor Image


Contributor Image

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: